The
term 'nation' is defined differently by different sources. One definition
is: "A people who share common customs, origins, history, and
frequently language."
Hindu
nationalism can be defined as the tendency of Hindus to define themselves
as a nation. It is often said that the late 1980's and 90's saw an
upsurge of Hindu nationalism in India. Translated into the realm of
politics, this resulted in an increased tendency for Hindus to define
their political activity in terms of common Hindu interests.
Historically, strong nationalistic tendencies emerge amongst peoples
during times of struggle or in the face of real or perceived threats.
For example, Scottish nationalism emerged through struggle with the
English, and draws its sustenance from the memories of this struggle.
The same is the case with Hindu nationalism. The formation of a strong
Hindu identity has its roots in the trials and tribulations of the
struggles against the Muslim and European colonialisms.
In the late 80's and 90's the rapid increase in Hindu nationalism
was a product of many perceived challenges. There was a general sense
of anxiety amongst Hindus about their collective future, as well as
a feeling that the secular Indian state was not capable of safeguarding
their collective interests, being neutral if not hostile to their
cultural norms. Gradually, this feeling spread to Hindus living in
other countries too, particularly Hindus in the UK and USA.
It can be appreciated that the emergence of nationalism is a natural
phenomenon, brought about by certain circumstances. It can sometimes
be a constructive force, and sometimes destructive, depending on how
it is harnessed.
There is a danger that nationalism can cloud clear thinking, leading
the nation to forego its identification and responsibility towards
humanity as a whole. This can lead to excesses, and even genocides,
as has been witnessed on numerous occasions throughout history.
Today, we see a great many Hindus who place a strong emphasis on identifying
Hindus together as a nation. Amongst the international Hindu community,
information flow through the medium of the Internet has spawned a
whole generation of vocal Hindu hyper-nationalists, who are full of
grievances at the harm suffered by Hindus today and in the past.
While
these individuals may be well intentioned (at the beginning at least),
an overly negative perspective has served to distance these Hindus
from the principles of Hinduism itself, as well as rendering them
incapable of doing much service to the cause that they claim to profess.
They spend their time in narrow circles indulging in conspiracy theories,
failing to understand that the great Hindu men and women of the past
employed very different means to uplift their people.
True
Hinduism can never accept injustice lying down, but at the same time
it cannot support an over emphasis on nationalism unless the nationalism
is informed by a greater spirit, by a spirit of dharma and universalism.
Hindu pluralistic ideas are of universal value, and can help humanity
emerge victorious from many contemporary struggles, such as the prevalence
of mental illness, religious conflict, consumerism and the breakdown
in family structure, to name but a few.
The very vocal nature of these Hindu hyper-nationalists has done a
disservice to Hinduism, because through their actions, universal Hindu
ideas become associated with a narrow-nationalism, and therefore become
limited in their appeal. Due to the minority of hyper-nationalist
Hindus, sensible-minded Hindu groups in the West often end up getting
labelled as Hindu nationalists or even fanatics simply for speaking
up for common sense Hindu issues such trying to increase their temple's
car parking space or teaching Hinduism in schools.
The need
of today are Hindus who have grasped the universal nature of Hinduism
and who can implement constructive solutions for applying Hindu ideas
into modern life, as well as to redress Hindu grievances in a way
that is in agreement with Hindu dharma.