::
EDITORIAL & ANALYSIS ::
The Kashmir
Problem
Jayesh
Ramzan
Hindu
Voice UK, May 2006
The
killing of 35 Hindus in Kashmir on the 1st of May was met by a typical
muted response by the world media and human rights organisations.
Tragically, the apathy with regards to such incidents extends to the
general Indian public and government too. Perhaps the reason is that
such indiscriminate killings of Hindus have become so commonplace,
that it is just accepted now as part of the way things are.
This
is especially true in Kashmir where Hindus (known as 'Kashmiri Pandits')
have been targeted in this way over the course of over 17 years during
which at least 62,000 people have been killed.
The Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir is divided into two major regions,
Kashmir, which is populated mainly by Muslims, and Jammu, which is
mainly Hindu. The overall population of the state is 67% Muslim and
29% Hindu, with small Buddhist, Sikh and Christian populations.
Jammu
and Kashmir joined the Union of India in 1947 under the Independence
of India Act. The decision to join India was made by Hari Singh, the
then ruler of the state. Pakistan was against this accession on the
grounds that Kashmir is a Muslim-majority region and shortly before
the accession, Pakistan-backed tribals invaded the state. The Indian
Army successfully beat back the invaders from most parts of Kashmir,
but before the area could be fully cleared the Indian PM Jawaharlal
Nehru referred the matter to the UN, which in hindsight turned out
to be a grave mistake. The UN treated both parties as equally aggrieved
rather than acknowledging the aggression by Pakistan, and passed a
resolution calling for Pakistan to vacate from the remaining areas,
and called for a plebiscite (vote) so that the citizens of Jammu &
Kashmir could determine the future of the state, even though it had
been lawfully acceded to India with the support of the largest Muslim
political party (the National Conference). Neither has Pakistan ever
vacated the areas of the state that it controls, which was agreed
as a pre-condition for the plebiscite to take place.
To this day, Pakistan continues to illegally occupy parts of Kashmir
and has initiated two further wars with India in an attempt to 'liberate'
the rest of the state from Indian control. It is a credit to the Indian
Army and the people of Kashmir that each attempt has failed.
This failure in conventional armed warfare has led to a 'proxy war'
against India in which it provides support to armed separatists who
carry out random attacks on Indian Army patrols, as well as indiscriminate
attacks on unarmed Hindus. This proxy war intensified in 1989 after
separatist militias declared a 'jihad' (holy war). Pakistan claims
that the terrorists are 'freedom fighters' fighting Indian rule and
that they only provide moral support to the latter. However considerable
evidence shows that the support has extended to financial, military,
and logistical support, and that the terrorists are not just Kashmiri,
but from countries such as Afghanistan, Libya, Algeria, Morocco and
even the UK. Part of the terrorist campaign is to kill and frighten
Hindus out of Kashmir, so that if a self-determination vote ever took
place, it is less likely to go India's way. The second stage consists
of imposing a strict Islamic rule on the people of Kashmir. Militants
have closed down beauty parlours and cinemas, and women are told they
must cover their faces or face punishment.
Indians fear that if Kashmir separated from India, it would lead to
the 'balkanisation' (fragmentation) of India, which has a huge number
of Muslims in other parts of the country. In fact the Indian state
of Uttar Pradesh alone has nine times more Muslims than Kashmir.
Consecutive Indian governments have done little much to combat the
terrorism other than verbally condemn the barbaric attacks taking
place and posting more troops in the state. Nothing has been done
to rehabilitate the majority of displaced Hindus (who continue to
languish in refugee camps), nor provide sufficient security to those
who choose to remain in Kashmir. Recently the current Congress-led
government even launched a passport and visa-free bus service between
Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and the rest of the state; such a service
can only serve to make the infiltration of terrorists even easier,
and wreak more havoc on the Kashmiri population.
So what can be done? More people around the world must help raise
awareness of the plight of Kashmiri Hindus. Contacting local politicians
and newspapers can help achieve this. Human rights organisations such
as Asia Watch and Amnesty International must also be contacted and
confronted as to why the terrorist attacks against unarmed civilians
is such a small concern of their's. Finally, the Congress Party of
India should be contacted and a request be made that sufficient plans
are brought into action to help bring back displaced Hindus to their
homeland, as well as the protection of Hindus and their places of
worship. Until such steps are taken by the general public, there will
never be the political in India help the dispossessed Hindus of Kashmir.
Until then, another vivisection of India once again appears to be
a possibility.
The
author is a student of International Law, and member of 'Homeland',
an international Kashmiri think-tank.